(CNN) -- The American Academy of Pediatrics' new recommendation to start middle and high schools no earlier than 8:30 a.m. is a turning point in the decades-old battle to start school later. Establishing adolescent sleep and school hours as public health issues -- and specifying an earliest acceptable bell time -- should energize communities to stop condemning another generation to chronic sleep deprivation.
The science supporting a
return to later school start times is clear, and has been since the
1990s. As a science writer, I've read many compelling studies that show
starting classes in the 7 a.m. hour -- not to mention sending
sleep-deprived teenagers onto the streets as early as 5:30 a.m. -- is
unhealthy, unsafe, and counterproductive. Raising three children who
battled a 7:17 a.m. high school bell time erased any remaining doubts
that they needed to start school later.
The root of the problem is that in puberty, a shift in circadian rhythms,
or "body clocks," pushes optimal sleep time forward. Most teenagers
simply can't fall asleep before 11 p.m. even if they're lying in bed for
hours. When dawn rolls around, they haven't gotten close to the 8½ to
9½ hours of sleep their still-growing brains and bodies need.
{DUR - it's because teens are too busy into the night....}
The resulting sleep
deprivation can produce mood swings, obesity, substance abuse, immune
disorders, and depression. Teenagers suffering from chronic fatigue
often can't pay attention in school and have difficulty concentrating
and remembering. Their judgment can be impaired, and sleepy drivers can
get in accidents.
"Almost all teenagers...become walking zombies because they are getting far
too little sleep," says James B. Maas, a sleep expert at Cornell
University.
Sleep deprivation in
children is also what the Academy of Pediatrics calls "one of the most
common -- and easily fixable -- public health issues in the U.S. today."
Turning science into
policy that fixes it, however, is another matter. When my family first
moved to Anne Arundel County, Maryland, in 2000, our school district had
already approved a pilot to start one of its 12 high schools at 9 a.m.
We were convinced that by the time my seventh-grader got into high
school, the whole district would follow suit. That plan was axed at the
last minute, and, since then, nothing has changed. That seventh-grader
is now 26, and my baby, then in kindergarten, is a college sophomore.
Many people react to
suggestions to change starting times with scorn, fear, or even vitriol.
Adults have vested interests in the early-start, early-release school
days, and those concerns often trump the best interests of kids. People
are wary of how later hours will affect daycare, sports and other
extracurricular activities, jobs, and even traffic patterns.
{Why is it always adults at fault?}
These fears help explain
why most school systems resist starting the school day later, even when
they want to do so. It doesn't help that sleep is an emotional and even
a moral issue for many people, and, sadly, is often considered a
luxury.
The good news is that we have solid evidence showing that fears about later bell times are groundless. Studies coming
out of the University of Minnesota, Brown University, and the
Children's National Medical Center provide evidence that running schools
at developmentally appropriate hours not only improves health and
academic performance but actually results in teenagers getting
significantly more sleep. Community life adjusts to school schedules,
not vice versa. The true obstacles aren't sports or bus costs, but the fear of change and failure of imagination. We've found schools in 43 states
that have worked out feasible, affordable ways to ensure later,
healthier hours by putting health, safety, and learning first. Their
solutions didn't require rocket science but, rather, a shift of
priorities.
No comments:
Post a Comment